Thursday, 14 April 2016

WHAT DO TEACHERS REALLY WANT FROM COURSEBOOKS?

This is a short information the writer tries to inform to the reader involved with the coursebooks. This writing is adopted from Hitomi Masuhara article.
From this brief article, we can know some potential benefits of studying teacher variables. Specifically to focus on how teacher’s needs and wants from coursebooks can be identified and catered for in the processes of material development.
There are  four parts which will be focused on this article, they are (1) whose need analysis? ; (2) teacher an endangered species; (3) empowerment of teachers (4) opportunities for change. In the part of  "Whose need analysis?". The “need” here, will defined in term of: (1)  ownership (whose needs are they?); (2) kinds   (what kinds of need identified?) (3) sources (what are the sources for the need?). For example: The kind of teachers’ needs are personal needs and professional needs. The source of personal needs are age, sex, cultural background, interest, educational background, and teachers’ language proficiency. The source of professional needs are preferred teaching styles, teacher training experiences, teaching experiences.  Besides teacher, the ownership whose need analysis are learners and administrators’ need.
These three needs are influence each other. For instance: when teachers are asked what their needs from a coursebooks, their responses may quite possibly influenced by: teachers’ perception of administrative needs. It is about the school is under-resourced and very strict syllabus is set which the teachers are expected to obey.
Let me give brief explanation about teacher’s need and teacher’s wants. Teacher’s need is about  a content inventory in developing and evaluating material, and information for the content, coverage, and format of teacher’s guide. Then, teachers’ want is about teacher’s motivation and commitment to teaching and its effect on learning and information as to how teachers react to and implement materials. 
Teachers an endangered species explains about course design that helping teacher to the local classroom needs. There are some model of course design. The mode that I would explain is model X: It starts from : need analysis à goals and objectivesà syllabus design à methodology/ materials à testing and evaluation. The steps I said before shows how the teaching contexts and the learner’s needs provide a framework for the objectives, then the decisions concerning the best method and materials should be made accordingly. 
In the part of empowerment of teachers deals with teachers’ need and wants could be reflected in the development and use of materials. Here, the steps of curriculum development: (1) curriculum planning, decision making role is policy makers, with the product is policy document; (2) specification  with ends means, need analysts methodologists are decision making role, and syllabus is the product; (3) programme implementation,  materials writer will procude teaching materials, teacher trainers will produce teacher-training programme; (4) classroom implementation , teacher will create teaching acts  while learners the  learning acts. Opportunities for change explains some stages in the reflecting teachers’ needs and wants. They are: (1) planning; (2) drafting; (3) evaluation; (4) piloting; (5) production; (6) post- production. Therefore, in brief, we can answer the question from Hitomi Masuhara "WHAT DO REALLY WANT FROM COURSEBOOKS?". Teacher wants a simple course design to make her successful learning in the condition she/ he does not have much time to do it. Teacher can use the model of course design that the writer try to explain in this article.
         
REFERENCE:
Tomilson, B. 1998. Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.



Sunday, 20 September 2015

LIST OF BOOKS TO EXPLORE PRAGMATICS STUDY


Pragmatics is one of the branches of linguistics. Students of  English Literature or English Education Department is very familiar with it. It is very easy to write thesis about pragmatics. The key is the literature review. You should find complete review to make your thesis perfect. Do not wait your thesis consultant to give the reference. Being independent student also determine your success in conducting the research. Here, the list of pragmatics reference. There are some books and international journals. I already use those book. I have them all. Just call me if you need it. You can also find it by downloading from website if it is free. Hopefully, It will help you for struggling your research. Good luck.


Allan, Keith. (1986). Lingustics Meaning Volume 2. London: Monash University/ Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Allen, R. C. and Gomer, Douglas. (1985). Film History: Theory and Practice. New York: McGrawHill.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How To Do Things With Word. Oxford: Oxfor University Press.
Bayragtaroglu, A & Sifianou, M.  (2001). Linguistic Politeness Across Boundaries. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Brown, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brummer, Vincent. (2006). Brummer on meaning and the Christian Faith : Collected Writings of Vincent Brummer. Hampshire: Ashgate Contemporary Thinkers on Religion.
Cutting, J. (2008). Pragmatics and Discourse. New York: Routledge.
Cylne, M. (1994). Inter-cultural Communication at Work Cultural Values in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dijk V, Teun A. (1997). Text and Context. Exploration in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
Fasold, R. (1996). The Sociolinguistics of Language. Cambridge: Blackell Publisher Inc.
Flick, U. (2009).  An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Fourth Edition.
Flor, A. C. & Juan, E. U. (2010). Speech Act Performance Theoretical, Empirical, and Methodological Issues. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Franco and Glavis.  (2013). The Role of Situational Context and Linguistics Context when  Testing EFL Vocabulary Knowledge in a Language Teacher Education Program: A Preliminary Approach. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15, 85-99.
Foo, T. C. V, Ad-Darraji, H.H.A ., Ismail, S.A. M. M., Abdullah, E. S.    (2012). Offering as a Commissive and Directive Speech Act: Consequence for Cross-Cultural Communication. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication, 2, 1-6.
Huang, Yan. (2007). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hufford, J.R. (1983). Sematics: A coursebook. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, Dell. (1974). Foundation in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Juan, E.U & Flor, A.M. (2010). Speech Act Performance Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. B.V.
Leech, G. (1983). The Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman Group Limited.
Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malmjaer, K. & Williams, J. (1998). Context in Language Learning & Language Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mangat, N. S. & Singh, R. (1996). Elements of Survay Sampling. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Punlishers.
Merriam, S. B (2009). Qualitative Research A Guide To Design and Implementation. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1992). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. New York: SAGE Publication.
Moelong, L.J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Reamaja Rosdakarya.
Murcia, M.  &  Olshetain, E.  (2000). Discourse and Context in Language Teaching. Cambridge. Cambridge University Perss.
Raco, J.R. (2010 ). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Jenis, Karakteristik dan Keunggulannya. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Requejo, M. D. P.  (2007). The Role of  Context in Word Meaning Construction: A Case Study. International Journal of English Studies, 7, 169-173.
Salgueiro, A. B.   (2010). Promises, Threats, and the Foundation of Speech Act Theory. International Pragmatics Association Journal, 2, 213-228.
Searle, J. R. (1976). Speech Act. An Analysis in Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif dan Kualitatif dan R & D.  Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutopo, H. B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.  Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction To Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Turner, G. (1993). Film as Social Practice. Second Edision. London: Routledge.
Yarahmadi, N & Olfati, N. (2011). Speech Acts Analysis of Anton Chekhov’s
The Seagull. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 12, 2522-2527.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language. Fourth Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Friday, 8 February 2013

INFO LOMBA BERBAHASA INGGRIS 2013

Dalam rangka memperingati Dies Natalis Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta sekaligus merupakan agenda rutin dari organisasi prodi HMP ESA FKIP UNS yang ke -10, kami menyelenggrakan berbagai macam lomba berbahasa inggris di DECADE ESA'S FAIR , lomba tersebut diantaranya :

1. SPEECH CONTEST
    Lomba ini dikhususkan untuk siswa SMP, info lebih lengkap silahkan klik disini.

2. DEBATE COMPETITION
    Lomba ini dikhususkan untuk siswa SMA, info lebih lengkap silahkan klik disini.

3. WALLMAGZ COMPETITION   
    Lomba ini dikhususkan untuk siswa SMA, info lebih lengkap silahkan klik disini.
   
4. ESSAY COMPETITION
    Lomba ini dikhususkan untuk mahsiswa, info lebih lengkap silahkan klik disini.